| |
Collection Details
Lent by Sir Henry Howarth to the 1912 exhibition
and included in his sale, Christies, 14 December 1923, lot 129:
bt by Sampson: sold anonymously, Lucerne, 8 September 1924, lot 88; sold
anonymously, Christies, 1 May 1925, lot 99: buyers name illegible
in auctioneers copy of catalogue; published in Belvedere (infra),
1929, as owned by Dr W Schlüter, Dortmund; Dr Benedikt, Berlin; G
M Richter, from whom bought by Agnew, 1937, and sold to Lord Faringdon
in 1946.
Literature
LIT: Crowe and Cavalcaselle, Painting in North
Italy, ed Borenius, 1912, I, p. 286; W Suida, Die Ruhe auf der Flucht
von Previtali, Belvedere, VIII 1929, pp. 1089; Berenson,
Italian Pictures, 1932, p. 473; Berenson, Venetian School, 1957, I, p.
148 (as autograph); F Heinemann, Giovanni Bellini e i Belliniani, 1959,
No. s.328I (accepting attribution and dating it to c.1510).
Exhibition Details
BFAC, Early Venetian Art, 1912, No. 49a; Agnew,
London, 1938, No. 42.
Related Picture
A similar, but much smaller, painting, with a different
setting, is or was in a private collection in Milan (Heinemann, No. s.328II
and fig. 510, dated by him to c.1523); a version with a similar group
of the Holy Family was sold anonymously, Sothebys, 18 February 1953,
lot 139.
Background
The artist has here included some of the picturesque
incidents associated with the escape of the Holy Family, but not often
depicted; cf Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, (Liber de Infantia), XX-XXIII.
The servant is one of the band of brigands who had attacked the Holy Family
in a forest. Moved by their plight, he took them under his protection
and escorted them on their journey as is shown in the background
to the right of the palm later being crucified with Jesus as the
good robber. The palm tree alludes to the miracle whereby, at Jesuss
bidding, it lowered its branches of dates for the Virgin as she rested
beneath it. According to the Golden Legend, the ox as well as the ass
sometimes accompanied the Holy Family. For the identification of the tower
in the background, which in view of the unusually detailed interpretation
of the event is likely to have some significance (particularly in view
of its omission from the Milan version), the compiler is indebted to Miss
Heimann of the Warburg Institute. This, she suggests, is the Tower of
David, a symbol of the Virgin, found in late medieval representations
of the Hortus Conclusus, and in later illustrations of the paragons of
the Virgin in the Loretan Litany.
<< Back
to Page 4
Copyright © The Trustees of the Faringdon
Collection 1999. All rights reserved.
|